|
FOR
FOUNDERS, OWNERS & CEOs
Don't Die in the
Saddle...
Executive Talent
Market Overview
Founder's
90 Sec. Recruiting Check-Up
New
Recruiting Model for Independents
Equity Corps
vs.
Executive Search
When to Call
How We Work
Our Guarantee
Answers
“...we
grew cash flow and profits.”
Mike Malik
Founder & CEO
Triad
Communication

Click
Chart to Read Case |
EQUITY CORPS vs. Executive search
There are three main
conventional outsourcing options for filling an empty C(x)O chair – retained search,
executive interim management, and contingency search. Equity Corps offers
an
alternative to conventional C(x)O search - Professional Management On Demand.
Each option has strengths and weaknesses, and will make sense for different companies at different times and
under different circumstances. The following table below presents the pros and cons
of each as we understand them.
Table - Outsourcing Options
for Executive Search & Acquisition
|
Retained Search |
Pros |
Cons |
|
Executive Credibility – Possess the
credentials and business experience necessary to attract top
talent.
Search Competence – Proficient at the
nuts and bolts of specification, search management, vetting;
etc.
Commitment – Will commit to work on your
search until you either cancel the project, or it is complete.
Great Service – Firms are
customer-centric and adhere to standards for professionalism and
ethics. |
High Failure Rate – 33% of retained
searches fail to complete, according to the industry
association.
Most Expensive – 33.33% of first year
compensation.
No Performance Incentive - fees are paid
regardless.
One-Sided Fee Structure – 1/3 down
payment; 1/3after 45 days; 1/3 due 45 days after that.
Junior Staffing – Firms cut costs to by assigning inexperienced,
junior people to your project. |
|
Contingency Search |
Pros |
Cons |
|
Hi Volume – Transactional model great
for multi-seat assignments, like staffing a sales team or IT
project.
Specialization – Narrow functional or
industry focus results specialized professional networks often
useful for searches below the executive level.
Contingent Fees – The firm only gets
paid if the client hires one of the firm’s candidates.
Less Expensive – 25% - 30% of first year
comp. |
Low Executive Credibility – Unlikely to
attract top talent.
Lower Executive Search Competence –
Minimal vetting; lower competence at search nuts and bolts.
Requires Strong Oversight –
Transactional mindset = No obligation to complete and short
attention span.
No Refunds – Non-Refundable Fees are paid at hire. |
|
Executive Interim Management |
Pros |
Cons |
|
Very Fast – Staffed within days or
weeks.
Pre-Vetted Executives = fast C(x)O
acquisition.
Maximum Flexibility – Executive does not
become an employee, and can work month-month, fixed term, or
test drive (to convert to employment).
No Lump Sum Fees. Firm’s economic
incentives are aligned with the client’s. |
Can be expensive. Comparable to the
fully loaded total payroll cost of hiring a top C(x)O. Typical
range is $20,000 - $40,000 per month.
Smaller Universe – Candidate pool is limited to executives
available at moment of need. |
|

|
Pros |
Cons |
|
Highest Vetting Standards – Every
executive is rigorously vetted prior to client
introduction.
Very Fast – Pre-Vetted Core Team = fast
searches for permanent C(x)Os and fast interim
deployment.
Shareholder Value Focus – Establishes a
foundation for driving returns during the search, and supports
Owner and C(x)O performance after the search.
Win-Win Fees – Month-to-Month fee
structure aligns firm’s economic incentives with client
objectives.
Competence, Service & Exec Credibility
³
Retained. |
A new approach offered by a start-up. |
Free
eBook - Owner's Roadmap for
Winning with
Outside Leadership
When to Call Equity Corps
HelpDesk |